Lame
anewphilosophy

I love holidays!

email your friends about this site

share

subscribe to this author

subscribe

send a message to this author

contact

reward this author with a star!

stars

subscribe to this author

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

Helpflag this site as inappropriate
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Politics
news, views
Green
Living an eco-friendly life
Money & Careers
Building your financial fitness
Family
Moms, dads, kids
Diversions
your daily dose
Style
chic and cheap
DIY
handmade, homemade, more
World
Going global
Well-Being
Everything for body and soul
A&E
a dose of 'cultcha'
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
Gossip
Pssst: The scoop on celebs
Contests

Image

Impeachment!

Posted by anewphilosophy Posted on: 06/10/08

Impeachment!

Dennis Kucinich just submitted the Articles of Impeachment against President Bush. How exactly is this not newsworthy enough to be covered? I haven't seen anything about it anywhere, in any major news outlet whatsoever.

Okay, I'm so totally not one of those people who believe in a media conspiracy, one way or another. I'm actually a member of the media-- I'm a journalist, and I know that I never slant or leave out anything because of my political beliefs. Neither do other journalists I know; it's just something we don't do, mostly because we think of ourselves as professionals who must stay neutral and fair. We may snort or roll our eyes while writing a story or driving to an interview, but our coverage is honest and equal. My minor in American Politics at Vassar was basically a minor in Media Politics, because most of my classes focused on that particular aspect. And I know enough now that I usually assert the absence of a bias, liberal or conservative, in the media.

But right now, for the first time, I'm a little skeptical.

Sure, Kucinich is a leftist, and is often mocked for his short stature and his radical politics. But he did just officially submit these articles, and they are going to be brought before Congress. That's a big deal, whether or not you take Kucinich seriously.

When those same articles were brought against Bill Clinton, it was all the media could talk about. Why aren't they reporting this stuff now? The charges against Clinton involved lying about sex; the charges against Bush involve lying about war, propaganda, and tyranny. Which one is more serious, d'you think?

Check out this video, which shows Mr. Kucinich presenting the articles to the House. Please note what rude asshats the Representatives are all being at the beginning of the video, as they seem to initially refuse to come to order. I suppose I'm speaking specifically of the Republican contingent, which seems to persist in speaking (more accurately, yelling) out of turn like the hooligans they, for the most part, always are.

1Vote!
Links
Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon
  • Good article. It would be helpful to have a link to the text of the Articles of Impeachment so we could read them. Also, the video link does not work.
    By David Cawthorn on June 10, 2008 23:12

  • I couldn't link to the articles directly, because as soon as the articles were released the Kucinich site that had posted them went down. I guess they got too much traffic. Some have claimed it's a government ploy of some kind, but I think traffic overload is the more likely culprit. :) I don't know why the video doesn't work for you, because it seems to work fine for me. Maybe try going directly to the Kucinich.us site (http://kucinich.us/) and looking at it from there?
    By anewphilosophy on June 11, 2008 14:52

  • Oh gee, the laughter in the middle there is the kicker, I think. Why can't anyone respect SHORT PEOPLE?
    By claire on June 13, 2008 00:47

  • I know! Good things come in small packages, people. I think we need a short president right about now, to bring us all down to earth and deflate our American-sized egos.
    By anewphilosophy on June 13, 2008 17:19

  • I think you've answered your own question, Soph. It's not being covered or being taken seriously precisely because it's Kucinich who has brought the articles of impeachment before the House. He is mocked, he is never taken seriously - he's the weird goofball everyone likes to make fun of, even, if in this instance, the matter at hand is a relatively serious one (regardless of its chances of success). Had it been some more prominent representative (read: with a better reputation) I bet this would have been all over the airwaves. Either that, or if the media still cared about Bush in any substantive way.
    By maya on June 19, 2008 18:56

  • That's true, Maya-- I think the media have pretty much discounted Bush. It's funny how little press he gets these days; I seem to go for weeks without hearing about him. Maybe that's why the primaries have seemed extra dramatic and publicized this year. If we're all just waiting for Bush to leave, it makes sense to focus on the next president instead of the current one.
    By anewphilosophy on June 28, 2008 21:43

  • You really need to watch the House and Senate more often. Not initially coming to order is what they do best--next to visiting the various Georgetown pubs. That was not an isolated event.
    By PhotoRanger on July 30, 2008 19:10

Leave a Comment


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback