Lame
anewphilosophy

I love holidays!

email your friends about this site

share

subscribe to this author

subscribe

send a message to this author

contact

reward this author with a star!

stars

subscribe to this author

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

Helpflag this site as inappropriate
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Politics
news, views
Green
Living an eco-friendly life
Money & Careers
Building your financial fitness
Family
Moms, dads, kids
Diversions
your daily dose
Style
chic and cheap
DIY
handmade, homemade, more
World
Going global
Well-Being
Everything for body and soul
A&E
a dose of 'cultcha'
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
Gossip
Pssst: The scoop on celebs
Contests

Image

John McCain: Sell By Nov. 08

Posted by anewphilosophy Posted on: 06/28/08

John McCain: Sell By Nov. 08

John McCain's recent visit to my hometown has really stirred in me a sort of incredulity, a complete and utter refusal to believe that this man is actually running a fairly legitimate campaign for the presidency.

Okay, so I got the appeal of McCain eight years ago, the first time he ran. Back then, McCain really was a maverick, disagreeing with his party on important issues and refusing to follow the Republican's Toe-The-Party-Line policy. But several things have changed since 2000, my friends.

First: John McCain is pretty much W's lap dog, or at least leading up to, during, and following the invasion of Iraq.* I don't want a man who is that closely associated with the top Republican thinkers (I use the term loosely) to be running my country,

Second: He was old then, but now he's TOO OLD. I mean, the man is 71. Isn't the country looking for change right now? How would electing the oldest white guy in the history of American presidents exactly send that "change" message?

And of course, in closing: if the workers of my hometown didn't like him, then why would anyone else?



*This reminds me of something else I want to discuss: how is it that now that a majority of Americans are against the war, our citizens only express anger and never apologies for their own callous behaviors? Um, guys, 80% of you were standing stupidly behind the president while I was attending peace marches back at the start of the war. How about some of you idiots fess up and, instead of saying "We were duped!" consider the phrase, "We didn't bother to think for ourselves!" Take some responsibility, yo!

...but this is a discussion for a later date.

0Vote!
Links
Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon
  • I was attending peace marches too. Marches and vigils and meetings and civil disobedience, before the war and for the five years this war has been dragging on. And I don't feel contempt for those who supported it. They are not idiots or robots. They were afraid. We were attacked. Our president said Al Qaeda was allied with Sadam Hussein. He said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was willing to use them. They believed him. He was our president. Who could believe he was so evil he would lie to start a war in which hundreds of thousands would be killed? You don't win over people by insulting them. We may be on opposite sides of the fence but we are all in this leaky boat together and we need each other. Treat people with contempt and they will respond with anger. Treat them with respect and they will be disarmed.
    By delia on June 28, 2008 09:33

  • But why were they afraid? Why would they be afraid of IRAQ after 9/11? Iraq never attacked us. Why would you believe something just because someone in power said so? I don't have contempt for people who are simply wrong, for people who are misled despite their best efforts to understand the problem. But I do have contempt for people who make no effort to think for themselves, no effort to look further than "The president told me so." You don't have to be an educated person to question what you're being told-- you just have to have an inquisitive mind, and enough sense to know that people, even if they look nice on TV, don't always tell the truth. I respect people who simply have different viewpoints than I do, if those views are well articulated and rational. But I cannot respect anyone who chooses, on purpose, to unquestioningly accept what they are being told, simply because they believe that to question authority is to be unpatriotic.
    By anewphilosophy on June 28, 2008 21:36

  • Furthermore, I have difficultly respecting anyone who believes that the solution to fear and uncertainty is to lash out and kill people. That's barbaric, ma'am, no matter what your political beliefs.
    By anewphilosophy on June 28, 2008 21:37

  • I had a big comment that just got lost, so I will summarize: most people are not raised with the concept that "questioning authority is a good thing." Just the opposite. People were afraid because 9/11 occurred. They looked to a leader they trusted to get them through this difficult time. And I have to say, it was pretty scary for me to see how our president was misleading us back then, so I can see how people would have resisted seeing just that. It's not right, or admirable, but there are reasons that people went along with him.
    By Olivia on June 29, 2008 15:31

Leave a Comment


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback