Lame
anewphilosophy

I love holidays!

email your friends about this site

share

subscribe to this author

subscribe

send a message to this author

contact

reward this author with a star!

stars

subscribe to this author

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

Helpflag this site as inappropriate
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Politics
news, views
Green
Living an eco-friendly life
Money & Careers
Building your financial fitness
Family
Moms, dads, kids
Diversions
your daily dose
Style
chic and cheap
DIY
handmade, homemade, more
World
Going global
Well-Being
Everything for body and soul
A&E
a dose of 'cultcha'
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
Gossip
Pssst: The scoop on celebs
Contests

Image

Sexism and E-Voting

Posted by anewphilosophy Posted on: 08/16/08

Sexism and E-Voting

Two completely unrelated topics to discuss, here— I just couldn't stand to let either one go by.

First off is a video of Brooke Hogan— a woman whose new reality show gives fresh meaning to the phrase "celebrity by proxy"— as she disses the entire female sex by explaining why women should, apparently, not be presidents.

"I’m so moody all the time, I know I couldn’t be able to run a country, ’cause I’d be crying one day and yelling at people the next day," says bubble-headed Brooke, and it's disturbing to see the thoughts of chauvinistic middle-aged men come straight out of the mouth of a curvy blonde.

I'm wondering: how come female stereotypes always come into play during election season, and never male ones? You never see women discussing politics by saying, "Oh, that John McCain, he could never be president. He's a man, and men are all testosterone-driven boars who can't keep it in their pants. I don't want my next president to be some sex-crazed Neanderthal."

Brooke, perhaps you ought to speak for yourself next time, and remember that most women are not, mercifully, anything like you.

Second to bat is this article, shot my way by my friend Claire. It talks about electronic voting machines and the havoc they've been causing in Ohio. I just don't get why we keep using these machines. It's been proven that they can be hacked into (quite easily, in fact) and that they are responsible for the loss of hundreds, if not thousands, of votes. In a crucial, narrow-margin state like Ohio, we can't afford this crap any longer.

I say, let's return to optically-scanned paper ballots. Didn't they always get the job done before?


0Vote!
Links
Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon

Leave a Comment


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback