Lame
anewphilosophy

New wife, new graduate, New Yorker.

email your friends about this site

share

follow this author

subscribe

send a message to this author

contact

reward this author with a star!

stars

follow this author

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

Helpinappropriate content
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Politics
news, views
Green
all eco, all the time
Family
well, you know
Diversions
Your daily dose
Style
it's gotta be cheap to be chic!
World
Going global
Well-being
body and soul
Relationships
working them out - or not
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
Etc.
everything else
Food & wine
Full of bite!

Image

What Happened, Gov. Strickland?

Posted by anewphilosophy Posted on: 07/21/09

What Happened, Gov. Strickland?

I was horrified to learn that Ohio governor Ted Strickland, a man who is usually pretty reasonable and smart, has developed Executive Order 2008 03S, which, when it takes effect (soon!), will make it impossible for milk producers to label their milk cartons "rBGH-free."

Why does this matter? Well, rBGH is an artificial hormone given to cows to force them to produce more milk. While the FDA states that there is no difference between milk made from rBGH-injected cows and those not injected with the hormone, many studies (and some of the FDA's own publications) have exposed the increase in disease that cows experience when injected with rBGH, particularly the disease known as mastitis. Mastitis is a disease that causes inflammation, swelling, and pus drainage, some of which ends up in the milk product. Milk from cows treated with rBGH contains higher levels of Insulin Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1); Humans naturally have IGF-1 in their bodies, but increased levels have been linked to colon and breast cancer.

As a consumer, I would prefer my milk providers not to use this chemical; I'd rather pay slightly more for a product that is 1) safer, and 2) not made in a way that causes horrible pain and debilitated sickness in cows. If companies ARE going to use it, I'd prefer that I know about it, so that I can use a brand that doesn't use it— and there are plenty of brands available. So why not let me choose for myself?

Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius vetoed a similar gag bill last month, so Ohio is actually the ONLY state where it's illegal to label milk as "rBGH-free." And why? Don't I have the right, as a consumer, to know what I'm consuming? What about when I choose to get pregnant— why wouldn't you want a pregnant woman to be able to consume chemical-free products in order to promote the health of the fetus?

I'm going to call my governor’s office tomorrow, and I hope my fellow Ohioans who have done their research and agree with me will call [(614) 466-3555] or email the governor to express their concerns, as well!


7Vote!
Comments (8)

Like this story? Share the news by clicking below:
This is a permanent link to this article. A great way to save it.
PermaLink
Post your article on Digg and let others vote on it.
Digg
Technorati is a blog indexing site.
Technorati
del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site.
Delicious
Kirtsy is a social bookmarking site featuring voting.
Kirtsy_addicon
Lame

about us | contact | terms | privacy | goodies | advertise | help | press | feedback